The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

#1129

Risk Level 2 - /home/runner/work/quivr/quivr/frontend/app/chat/[chatId]/tests/page.test.tsx

The code changes seem to be mostly about importing and mocking modules for testing. There doesn't seem to be any high-risk changes. However, it's important to ensure that the mocks accurately represent the real modules to avoid false positives or negatives in the tests. Also, the getHistory function in the useChatApi mock returns an empty array. If the tests depend on the chat history, this could lead to incorrect test results.

Risk Level 3 - /home/runner/work/quivr/quivr/frontend/app/chat/[chatId]/components/ActionsBar/ActionsBar.tsx

1. The useEffect hook is used to update the hasPendingRequests state. However, there's no error handling for the getHistory function. If it fails, the error will be unhandled which could lead to unexpected behavior. Consider adding a try-catch block.

useEffect(() => {
  const updateNotificationsStatus = async () => {
    const chatId = params?.chatId as string | undefined;
    if (chatId !== undefined) {
      try {
        const history = await getHistory(chatId);
        setHasPendingRequests(checkIfHasPendingRequest(history));
      } catch (error) {
        console.error(error);
        // handle error
      }
    }
  };
  void updateNotificationsStatus();
}, [getHistory, params?.chatId]);

2. The params?.chatId is cast to string | undefined but it's not clear if params can be undefined. If params can be undefined, params?.chatId would be undefined and the cast would be unnecessary. If params can't be undefined, the optional chaining operator (?.) would be unnecessary.

📑🔍🚧

Powered by Code Review GPT